A separate GEO score measures authorship, source links, specific evidence, dates, introduction alignment, and word count.
GEO checker
See whether a page is ready for generative search.
Content Miner checks authorship, source links, specific evidence, dates, title-to-introduction alignment, and word count to assess a page's generative-search readiness.
Content Miner checks
- Attributable author and source links
- Specific evidence such as numbers and measurements
- Publication or modification dates
- Title-to-introduction alignment and word count
What you get
A result page with decisions, not a vague audit.
The public checker gives you a clear starting point. Your workspace keeps the larger scan organized and turns the findings into a useful next step.
Findings identify missing authors, source links, dates, and specific evidence such as figures or measurements.
Title-to-introduction alignment and word count flag weak openings and thin coverage for review in the site report.
FAQ
Questions people ask about the GEO checker.
What is GEO, and how is it different from SEO?
SEO checks search fundamentals. GEO measures attributable authorship, source links, specific evidence, publication or modification dates, alignment between the title and introduction, and word count.
Why does my page score well on SEO but badly on GEO?
Usually because the page is technically clean and cites nothing. GEO is the pillar that specifically measures external sources, concrete specifics, dates, and depth, so a well-built marketing page that asserts without quantifying will pass SEO and fail GEO. It is the gap this site had too, which is why these answers now carry sources.
Will Content Miner add citations for me?
No. It reports which pages have no external sources and no specific evidence. Choosing what to cite is editorial work, and a citation added to move a score rather than to support a sentence is the thing the report is trying to help you avoid.
Will Content Miner change my pages?
No. Content Miner does not rewrite, generate, redirect, publish, or delete anything. It reports what it measured and leaves the judgment where it belongs. Findings that cannot be cleared by ordinary work say so instead of sending you after them.
Where do these checks come from?
Both published guidance and our own judgment, and it is worth knowing which is which. The search-facing signals follow Google Search Central and the Bing Webmaster Guidelines, and the structured-data checks follow the schema.org vocabulary. The thresholds — how many words, how many questions, how many sources count as enough — are ours. That is why every finding shows the sentence the extractor actually read: so you can disagree with the threshold and still trust the measurement.
Published · Last updated